Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

マッチングアプリで知り合い SNS型ロマンス詐欺で505万円被害 群馬・太田市の34歳男性 | 上毛新聞社のニュースサイト

www.jomo-news.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-09-14–2024-09-16
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Ota34male505man cryptoassetstaken usingmatchingapp falseaffection/intimacy. Cryptoassetlossnotinvestmentpretext, employerworkstatusnotemployertheft;13thnotyearfilled.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Assettaken crypto not automatically investment/trading pretext.
subject
Ota_target
reported outcome
actual_crypto_asset_loss
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
0f06b70b1164ddbe4ca16b7235df865f1d980f8701935ce97418a9bf8ed71048
current source binding
input hash
8db689596620af41ee66aa98b76fce6621b0c55864ee5de5e4a4336ea6acf2e0
decision id
31a7441c6b20a3c007bc86a840df40d7c386c5f2709ea82522ed9874e50262c2
document id
102139f6d983210f0d0f3abbe8780dc38d25d92a6b0513d8769aa8b8d982edc0
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
eeb68c090ce1b70bb27ee6389cc1fb892e56a3c1883079f48c1dac6793f53376
finding evidence sha256
1fb7ab2cf8b1d1351fdcc3095ecd4befa65f8011deaf9850bea101bb15bf1301
enrichment payload sha256
7468eeb283217b4feb66cf3e465ebfadebd4a6beb3a38f681e9715c332f9c966
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/102139f6d983210f0d0f3abbe8780dc38d25d92a6b0513d8769aa8b8d982edc0/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
3d22299fca2072504aebf07e13b0b25e0709039518ef68c3e509d5ff5fa4ee38

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

crypto transferreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendinginsufficient context
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 102139f6d983210f0d0f3abbe8780dc38d25d92a6b0513d8769aa8b8d982edc0
Decision: 31a7441c6b20a3c007bc86a840df40d7c386c5f2709ea82522ed9874e50262c2
Base reviewed revision: 0f06b70b1164ddbe4ca16b7235df865f1d980f8701935ce97418a9bf8ed71048

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.