Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

ロマンス詐欺で44歳女性が3600万円被害 外国人男性かたり、SNSで投資話 千葉・船橋

www.sankei.comJapaneseObserved 2024-05-02
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Keep the completed own affection-money clause but do not complete the ending ロマンス詐… into investigative action. No actual crypto payment, AI, age vulnerability, country fromChiba/language/yen, calendar year, refund or clinical effect.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

text
Keep the completed own affection-money clause but do not complete the ending ロマンス詐… into investigative action. No actual crypto payment, AI, age vulnerability, country fromChiba/language/yen, calendar year, refund or clinical effect.
field
interpretation
source layer
analytical_context_from_verified_GAL_metadata
own role source layer limits
notes
Keep the completed own affection-money clause but do not complete the ending ロマンス詐… into investigative action. No actual crypto payment, AI, age vulnerability, country fromChiba/language/yen, calendar year, refund or clinical effect.
actors
Item 1
role
targeted_person
field
desc
qualification
One44-year-old woman; no vulnerability inferred.
Item 2
role
alleged_offender
field
desc
qualification
Unverified foreign-male persona, not actual nationality.
Item 3
role
authority
field
desc
qualification
Police attribution; no completed investigation from clipped ending.
countries
No listed value
developments
No listed value
explicit calendar years
No listed value
exact ROOT qualified record note
true
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
2fe5f348fbe57ce73c6ee25bf0b46c3743a427f0b420fb8db59263c2c4346c4a
current source binding
input hash
68b0eaddd1dbfa9fd61505d7dd80ac4f4baf0b5b162f7631d25efba4f8f7325c
decision id
5dcb03fb3497ca43fe393e96c175dd8351630c91cdae36f610bf53c15c20a380
document id
13e8fbdb6fe64f39a21621e2155a0c46fb116612f82e15a63465c2b001c2a145
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
c9d2488f9774dbb47439897c8cb931cad0b9183c586dedb21e0ab0227c3bfedf
finding evidence sha256
faa1534446c8c9c40aeb17ba9ed1238f6f02979c6e6971386f24c931bdb80d1e
enrichment payload sha256
5357857e142a3a61dc5cbf1f53780390dba6c358cd751dfd1f33528f53b27863
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/13e8fbdb6fe64f39a21621e2155a0c46fb116612f82e15a63465c2b001c2a145/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
6f69e4ab0e654acf1b25df08c53a23148e92d62941ada53a5fbd9c23fb352b78

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed

About36million yen reported, no refund or transfer-currency assumption.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
source associates

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationallegationStage: completed

Police characterization in same own account expressly links induced affection and money extraction.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingallegationStage: completed

Same own romantic-financial account names cryptocurrency-investment solicitation; not proved returns or genuine trading.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationallegationStage: completed

Specific investment solicitation via SNS beyond merely meeting there; investment asset is not automatically crypto transfer.

Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 13e8fbdb6fe64f39a21621e2155a0c46fb116612f82e15a63465c2b001c2a145
Decision: 5dcb03fb3497ca43fe393e96c175dd8351630c91cdae36f610bf53c15c20a380
Base reviewed revision: 2fe5f348fbe57ce73c6ee25bf0b46c3743a427f0b420fb8db59263c2c4346c4a

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.