Help, reporting and prevention
warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- unspecified
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsPrevention & support
Swipe Left on These 5 Common Online Dating Scams
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
Story groups for this report
Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.
How to read this record
Dating-appfake-promisesdecoder/generalwarning, broke/brokenhearteddefinitionnotindividualcompletedharm.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Current annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- e4afd71b0e49c22544327c730fa5c0b587ae8344a0799268812c7b7c213cf800
- current source binding
- input hash
- 351e17e7fe419f50dcabba137ee07dca0cb41fdd0382a0f133140490930fafde
- decision id
- d2e1589d2575288f0469b2697f70dcd59651e422f5fa92e5cfe04ac1f5e37986
- document id
- 17469026b63ec71a3b85a14af1a82f2fa9eeee0c84c906156dfc58e4743a2bc4
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- cb914e5cf7a0a4dbafd6ab4316ba484233638bc4caf7a9a8c0f2863b9efb9d68
- finding evidence sha256
- 5d8cde1028f57cb18d8dea114fd83f6c276174f15b144fa9a350f8de7245d3f4
- enrichment payload sha256
- eec280e7a31460ec23871a9ce8259e898e05cc00273ad49ac2ded9a482e3c9a4
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/17469026b63ec71a3b85a14af1a82f2fa9eeee0c84c906156dfc58e4743a2bc4/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- Item 2
- json pointer
- /17469026b63ec71a3b85a14af1a82f2fa9eeee0c84c906156dfc58e4743a2bc4
- artifact sha256
- ddf7afec769c8088cc20dc11a597fa62518326ce6da4188698233e30704e0c29
- annotation key
- f34f8075b8d0ff1fd4bf1efb3f631f037e9678b4ebb96e2bcb69541f9a7e2731
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Relationship-based deception
fabricated relationshipgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Technical facilitation
platform communicationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
- Scope
- general
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | insufficient context |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | insufficient context |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | not reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 17469026b63ec71a3b85a14af1a82f2fa9eeee0c84c906156dfc58e4743a2bc4
Decision: d2e1589d2575288f0469b2697f70dcd59651e422f5fa92e5cfe04ac1f5e37986
Base reviewed revision: e4afd71b0e49c22544327c730fa5c0b587ae8344a0799268812c7b7c213cf800
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.