Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Prevention & support

Love Scamming - Der Betrug mit der großen Liebe: Ein Interview mit einem Opfer

www1.wdr.deGermanObserved 2024-08-22
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own GreatLoveScamming victiminterview/onlinecaution. No individualpaidquantity/clinicaldiagnosis/actualsupportsuccess/identityverified/fromotherURLborrowed.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own GreatLoveScamming victiminterview/onlinecaution. No individualpaidquantity/clinicaldiagnosis/actualsupportsuccess/identityverified/fromotherURLborrowed.
subject
Aug19_unit_75
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
5a9481069dddd133414cc838e9b08b8833f3de4e5201f5be4d7ddbc5a8e026ae
current source binding
input hash
a1987781472b9e515e6557970a29df6f96f6370f12c53e7d16e748d5725262ea
decision id
a4b85efc96444e85806c317bffab91a5e53f55e1098dc4c8c73ae14027cabd48
document id
202c14e3c897988e231551f270fc1a8cac50b461a0a3cd4893f95bd70a4ff5c4
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
1b71fef2ac4c083f1166d297a8055166900202c7955536912e59c0b407d836ce
finding evidence sha256
6ce7c2a707320b132ef4e00dead8456be01232ad4c80844c65409a41f1323551
enrichment payload sha256
56628c83a636865fc6a1efb02fd6f303f29aaaafa6b4d0bc2126e1ab88b52b7f
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/202c14e3c897988e231551f270fc1a8cac50b461a0a3cd4893f95bd70a4ff5c4/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
44b6fe4f0623bad69481ff798fb4267fa5f75927de4437ec159ec6794e006548

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

unspecifiedgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harminsufficient context
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 202c14e3c897988e231551f270fc1a8cac50b461a0a3cd4893f95bd70a4ff5c4
Decision: a4b85efc96444e85806c317bffab91a5e53f55e1098dc4c8c73ae14027cabd48
Base reviewed revision: 5a9481069dddd133414cc838e9b08b8833f3de4e5201f5be4d7ddbc5a8e026ae

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.