Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Own description distinguishes an investment-fraud target who paid/transferred 1.22 million from account providers, one claiming a boyfriend romance scam induced disclosure of banking credentials. Record that target loss as mixed-scheme, account-use/credential misuse and relationship deception as the provider claim, with participant-claiming-victimization role. The civil court adjudication is a completed trial, not criminal conviction or acquittal; prosecutor nonprosecution and civil nonliability remain explicit in this note. No compensation return or all-romance allocation; relationship-linked investment mechanism remains insufficient.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
Investigation or court: Taiwan
Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: The actual named court adjudicating the civil claim supplies this judicial-location candidate only.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
notes
The article reports an investment victim paying/handing over 122萬元 and a civil claim against account providers. One provider claimed romance deception; prosecutors declined prosecution and the civil court found her not liable. This is not a criminal acquittal of the investment perpetrator or proof of her knowing participation.
context kind
FILE-derived DATE20 notes and unknown-role qualifications
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; no native SQL producer, country inference, case identity or new semantic review.
unknown roles
Item 1
country.operation
Item 2
country.publisher
Item 3
country.victim
Item 4
date.incident
Item 5
date.procedural
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true
source specific current qualifications
note
Own description distinguishes an investment-fraud target who paid/transferred 1.22 million from account providers, one claiming a boyfriend romance scam induced disclosure of banking credentials. Record that target loss as mixed-scheme, account-use/credential misuse and relationship deception as the provider claim, with participant-claiming-victimization role. The civil court adjudication is a completed trial, not criminal conviction or acquittal; prosecutor nonprosecution and civil nonliability remain explicit in this note. No compensation return or all-romance allocation; relationship-linked investment mechanism remains insufficient.
context kind
FILE-derived ALL24 review notes and explicit denials
qualification
Exact authored FILE fields; an empty denial list adds no denial and changes no code state.
changes to explicit denials
No listed value
Source statement flags
raw verified
false
is publisher quote
false
source truth verified
false
interpretation not source literal
true
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
The loss belongs to the described investment victim; it is not automatically the account provider’s romance loss.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
trial
reason
The reported civil adjudication and non-prosecution are kept distinct from criminal conviction or finality.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 219bf0378c0339c0a6818879030cfaf51855d810331055123692fdd71c024ecb Decision: 4a38debb43f6e3044e07a7284c868e889abb6e5ba3a16bcb65d1701a83dca7ed Base reviewed revision: 981cb337042d89c806c958afa0548124970761fc1694069d41f780def768b917
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.