Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Teluk Intan lawyer loses RM1.76mil in love scam

www.thestar.com.myEnglishObserved 2024-09-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own TelukIntanlawyer1.76mMYRlovefraud/foreignmanWhatsAppJuly. Literalconflict1.75othercopyretained/nonadditive, foreignpersonanotactualcountry, no geologydetail/clinicalharm/crypto/yearfill.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own TelukIntanlawyer1.76mMYRlovefraud/foreignmanWhatsAppJuly. Literalconflict1.75othercopyretained/nonadditive, foreignpersonanotactualcountry, no geologydetail/clinicalharm/crypto/yearfill.
subject
Sep09_unit_63
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
c9cd0f8feea8c9e46f2df76d74e65e0039041081e999d74ec0d0e4deada47a0b
current source binding
input hash
d7412de03aa928cfe47ee0e721f81eb58d0362f1b4b31941c3fa1c863b42c0dc
decision id
eee315dfd7af0e6f52544a4ce3a9e49eee0de6d057890e45a6d4328892aeb4a2
document id
387fa065b98c55184412d5813e39ffb7b80b2859f59f5e74ce5921c80c368afa
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
b016366f9ca5ac4813bec8e0e318193352ac358e8d5e1faf27d43e8e33a8bb77
finding evidence sha256
a31e6646879693aa1600516bbc93cf9500c3ba556ec23396c73ee4ba07d7c911
enrichment payload sha256
358e8963a546fe2bc5d1097f77dbda1d3c0ed6fc102bce2b57934d58f9dcd828
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/387fa065b98c55184412d5813e39ffb7b80b2859f59f5e74ce5921c80c368afa/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
98b7f8d571e096d39f37a1c21dc9dee06e09ceec3425e42cf00c27e53ffdadd2

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 387fa065b98c55184412d5813e39ffb7b80b2859f59f5e74ce5921c80c368afa
Decision: eee315dfd7af0e6f52544a4ce3a9e49eee0de6d057890e45a6d4328892aeb4a2
Base reviewed revision: c9cd0f8feea8c9e46f2df76d74e65e0039041081e999d74ec0d0e4deada47a0b

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.