Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「イラクで医師、日本へ帰るお金必要」とロマンス詐欺 60代女性が45万被害|秋田魁新報電子版

www.sakigake.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-22
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Daisen woman's reported loss comprises300000yen cash plus150000yen electronic-money usage rights. Keep those components distinct; the doctor-in-Iraq/return-to-Japan pretext is a claimed persona/travel story. No operation country, physical route, refund, arrest or calendar year is inferred.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
The title's Iraq/Japan references are claimed identity/travel context, not operation/victim countries; no police action beyond announcement, refund or explicit year is supplied.
subject
the source-described woman in her60s
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
Reported loss has cash and electronic-money-right components, not an assumed physical handover.
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
42d16fb5dc54275744dccb44102590bb814c59389439b129a1e02a21e4b3e911
current source binding
input hash
9c6c6b88c3b8fe98539246251dc83526b7d56725866d683998d4acc96fd089c8
decision id
92429e7dbe32decc7189e4454fc222551dad450c987016c4ab905a5e712c4560
document id
56dc4cdac6d2833ce894c413df153393b4dc66a2f45e7a126e05768987e393c5
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
e0958a8ec02d2299ad6fccf3c5e0d55da7ab621c59ebc535e8d482d84d280e56
finding evidence sha256
a22be13550c386c0af2032c7d05cb7c7a3d2db8628e17d6a70ed376229487f12
enrichment payload sha256
e0d5fabdfe73793d4c3995063a46e98881d4d136ed33b8e58cc0d4bee7e1849d
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/56dc4cdac6d2833ce894c413df153393b4dc66a2f45e7a126e05768987e393c5/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
bcab35264111c5927af4febe0890a746458c5d119b2bac318c124c388bf3983a

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 56dc4cdac6d2833ce894c413df153393b4dc66a2f45e7a126e05768987e393c5
Decision: 92429e7dbe32decc7189e4454fc222551dad450c987016c4ab905a5e712c4560
Base reviewed revision: 42d16fb5dc54275744dccb44102590bb814c59389439b129a1e02a21e4b3e911

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.