Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

SNSで面識ない女性名からメッセージ 40代男性が256万円詐欺被害 群馬県警長野原署 | 上毛新聞社のニュースサイト

www.jomo-news.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-09-06
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own Hokumou40s male public servant2568000JPY CASH/false-affection-or-familiarity viaSNS. Unmet woman-name message not verified female identity/operationcountry, public employment not employer-funds theft; no eventyear/investment/crypto borrowed.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own Hokumou40s male public servant2568000JPY CASH/false-affection-or-familiarity viaSNS. Unmet woman-name message not verified female identity/operationcountry, public employment not employer-funds theft; no eventyear/investment/crypto borrowed.
subject
Sep02_unit_49
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
af1cd81bb2990678be744935961b19cc1c544776efc4b59c67a2d502e9f71d3b
current source binding
input hash
2b5077b4389c3cca14ded421729aba2544b2e823586e01b91eb7decd00c8694b
decision id
95f0cb6885be08747a0d02dff9d723f0d666ff54f69e9eab81672f3684a001e5
document id
693b6069b9d21dc24802604624f060cf637d279aa8f6fbc17437f5190761317f
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
59017dda02fbb68b125c4b37681fdabc211a205c8f6c5a8282b452019780aacb
finding evidence sha256
02208e9a18c49e352553d35ba904e5b703e7027b394f5bfeee192e3f0674b918
enrichment payload sha256
7711ca59e263cea850c722c39ceb12ab507303850a8b9dd7673b5519cd0c7b78
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/693b6069b9d21dc24802604624f060cf637d279aa8f6fbc17437f5190761317f/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
3fec6be7526dea269f22d519c061d7b4d37018c747c71a3026b924cfe4b904bd

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendinginsufficient context
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 693b6069b9d21dc24802604624f060cf637d279aa8f6fbc17437f5190761317f
Decision: 95f0cb6885be08747a0d02dff9d723f0d666ff54f69e9eab81672f3684a001e5
Base reviewed revision: af1cd81bb2990678be744935961b19cc1c544776efc4b59c67a2d502e9f71d3b

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.