Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

ロマンス詐欺で2070万円振り込む 群馬・桐生市の61歳男性 | 上毛新聞社のニュースサイト

www.jomo-news.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-06-20
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Kiryu SNS money-loss profile and induced-feelings mechanism; no arrest, investment or physical-cash route inferred.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
The headline amount is20.70million yen. Money/cash wording is not proof of a physical handover, police attribution is not an arrest or report-taking event, and day19 supplies no event year. No investment or return of funds is inferred.
subject
the man and fraud mechanism in the Kiryu report
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
SNS trust manipulation and reported money taking
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
85eac1a9b861386a750b4397cfa2c3765f9174953c7657476d248fb6bb7ac110
current source binding
input hash
42c34776a9335a1f1e99f6131982b4f8c9c028054de60141a33cfe07ef7fbe48
decision id
02864ddcc1fe6ccad224f6c8ca2f27208543e3814a682fa763b18afe98ee4c17
document id
70c4d7daa721694d8fc61f04fdfb06f640398f420ca4b0a53ecca9a98f178559
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
9da3c8b49ee69752d7ca21ddc12b4c2b7e7fcb130de701f897fa078109a44574
finding evidence sha256
5b49626e9fb18e82d154668074ab67a472565c9202b278a7ad223dfac9611a4d
enrichment payload sha256
dd1c0aa7457042c24a1d9a0a573cb19ce30c64168fec8fc02b5cead3827d5754
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/70c4d7daa721694d8fc61f04fdfb06f640398f420ca4b0a53ecca9a98f178559/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
e536a6e596808ba538d716ea212a2a377f15c8a8fa8134cac6d2ed2e35586665

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 70c4d7daa721694d8fc61f04fdfb06f640398f420ca4b0a53ecca9a98f178559
Decision: 02864ddcc1fe6ccad224f6c8ca2f27208543e3814a682fa763b18afe98ee4c17
Base reviewed revision: 85eac1a9b861386a750b4397cfa2c3765f9174953c7657476d248fb6bb7ac110

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.