Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Research & trends

Romance scams cost consumers $1.14 billion last year. It's a ‘more insidious' fraud, expert says

www.nbcchicago.comEnglishObserved 2024-07-03
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own consumer aggregate is1.14billion dollars last year, without an explicit calendar year or currency type. Wealth accounts accessed through human connection support a general trust-exploitation mechanism; spotting/cutting ties is prevention advice. Preserve source-reported aggregate scope, not independent incidence, individual loss, clinical harm or measured effectiveness; cybercriminal wording alone does not specify a digital method.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own consumer aggregate is1.14billion dollars last year, without an explicit calendar year or currency type. Wealth accounts accessed through human connection support a general trust-exploitation mechanism; spotting/cutting ties is prevention advice. Preserve source-reported aggregate scope, not independent incidence, individual loss, clinical harm or measured effectiveness; cybercriminal wording alone does not specify a digital method.
subject
own_source_context
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
source-specific scope and inference limits retained
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
research_statistics
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
155533e83033aadce9da8c712b3e036cc1d4aa6efbada624d9f7d7789b0cfadf
current source binding
input hash
1c3987c7d2814d81751f5675173a43a2a5bcbdb7fb461d573e42da66742f43ec
decision id
4f77dd2812a6729b8f2751781766565db2f346cdc12317de36653354a528332e
document id
764f713aae6e6f9b4421ce75b02ddda935aae68f6da19a87dbbe6ab6a6059a32
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
1ee0d1b5f12f09f189b890e8ab23ed4eaf2c36be1c758f4ffffb686eca841a84
finding evidence sha256
603b8b7f9b01da5e963a96fc4f3233654dc5922c6375552d45e081ee2cbf4b39
enrichment payload sha256
c813f12c64a53457de315e0a8021704b17c4ea387ea82f01b3c1631b1fc61162
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/764f713aae6e6f9b4421ce75b02ddda935aae68f6da19a87dbbe6ab6a6059a32/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
b20f4c3e333d6c5566faf7d25bd6d08ecf7ca17c7168da46aaf0305cefc3eaa2

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

trust manipulationgeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationinsufficient context
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 764f713aae6e6f9b4421ce75b02ddda935aae68f6da19a87dbbe6ab6a6059a32
Decision: 4f77dd2812a6729b8f2751781766565db2f346cdc12317de36653354a528332e
Base reviewed revision: 155533e83033aadce9da8c712b3e036cc1d4aa6efbada624d9f7d7789b0cfadf

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.