Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

「たくさん利益が出る」 60代男性が約1億6000万円詐取される 大分県警日田署管内でSNS型ロマンス投資詐欺 | 西日本新聞me

www.nishinippon.co.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-11-18
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own HitaPolice60male16080mancash, profitableinvestmentRomance and警戒warning. Amountrounded16000vs16080 notseparatevictims, HitaagencynotAsakuraresidenceproof, promisesnotactualreturns. Aprilthisyear/18th lacksliteralyear, nofalseChineseidentityfromanothercopy.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
warning
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
68a25b1e47e98fb5c0f19382f302fcbd5cec164d4e45669115573037a8d61527
current source binding
input hash
3a3675c4fa8165a394df959b244a835c37104a02b462d6c4881d64cbb1e48e3c
decision id
b1937931e01c956c62e07b11fa501b947522ab9a25adac6d23ce4594662e3fee
document id
85c1fb5c2ef2fa636058a5d9d0a2f22db5e4c88501df20924fbd183b5e1653d3
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
cbd33751645a05efd7b6cccaf159e7ee0b541cc5ec30a786ed90377371936092
finding evidence sha256
d1e76cc485f177d5bf47e755c55f44440fefbab4a76faaa07e30c0fddd6ef748
enrichment payload sha256
6d74216f1da250511cd5722e267fb000a19d65309f97c3f9292c3ebaa95b520e
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/85c1fb5c2ef2fa636058a5d9d0a2f22db5e4c88501df20924fbd183b5e1653d3/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
55bfa17f552eb01638fcf834548eba305d5171bc4192fc99f05443c98d8c12ac

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

investment tradingreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Investment pretext

promised returnsreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

warninggeneral warningStage: not applicable
Interpretation details
Scope
general
Person or institution described
unspecified
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextreported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionnot reported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Shared wording

「たくさん利益が出る」 60代男性が約1億6000万円詐取される 大分県警日田署管内でSNS型ロマンス投資詐欺

Own distinctive Hita-police60male16080man/cash/SNS-investment caption and matching profits/16000man headline support shared Nishinippon/47News work. Rounded headline/paragraph remain separate values, agency not target residence, yearless April/18th not eventdate. Other Hita genders/amounts remain distinct pending explicit recurrence comparisons.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: 85c1fb5c2ef2fa636058a5d9d0a2f22db5e4c88501df20924fbd183b5e1653d3
Decision: b1937931e01c956c62e07b11fa501b947522ab9a25adac6d23ce4594662e3fee
Base reviewed revision: 68a25b1e47e98fb5c0f19382f302fcbd5cec164d4e45669115573037a8d61527

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.