Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Own woman’s loss/collaborator narrative preserves near10m versus roundedtitle, prior stress, regret not self-blame, and no specified mule/other offense/forced work or real Mike/Jack identity.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
desc
reason
Own source places stress before app engagement. No clinical diagnosis, country or isolation is inferred.
subject
unnamed woman describing prior stress and app use
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
prior_stress_not_post_scam_condition_or_isolation
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false
source specific current qualifications
field
title
reason
Keep near10million description versus rounded title; generic collaborator wording does not specify laundering, another distinct offense or forced work. Mike/Jack remain reported labels/personas.
subject
woman whose loss and later collaborator role are described
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: c2f17d2f7dab9cf76e440c45e313630a5fdcbb450a646523c538212370e57993 Decision: 3d0f1449f61a1b52347fc492ad663567ed00f6d7ac50598b04c98d7a1ac60d5f Base reviewed revision: b29ee252b206a2383d95f7b8a84199b0f7b35a310401f76060d6aa7784f10dcb
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.