Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

男性アイドルと信じてやり取り… 大館市の女性、11万3千円詐欺被害|秋田魁新報電子版

www.sakigake.jpJapaneseObserved 2024-09-21
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Odate40sfemale113000JPYelectronic-money-rights taken/fakemaleidol. Idolname/albumpretextnotcopiedfromotherURL, cash/crypto notassumed;20thnotyearfilled.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

Victim location: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Investigation or court: Japan

Basis: place_mapping
Scope: article
Reason: Contextually reviewed geographic role with exact source evidence. Nationality, language and URL suffix do not establish location.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
113000JPYelectronicmoneyrights; name/album not borrowed from otherURL.
subject
Odate_target
reported outcome
own_amount_asset
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
92d8829e3c2876ffe7eb13c7025276978a6a4a679029a7cd6db6a5a06c46c762
current source binding
input hash
0d5895a182904291b49b6c7155066fdac021e046f88a8bb45f89981d736a5bae
decision id
710d48031e757a9330765b3b1f042d45ba4bf14be4ec53d6932cd7306f14cd88
document id
ee15dbdeee1d0d4a0d2733ab6360e730c9b67ba354081bc9f507ed6ebc8220f0
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
885dac1f73dd80d169c94a6d8965f8d1bfd4c86b47a014db406d0aabed1158f2
finding evidence sha256
3aa775bb6a34084b8962df45b3761c348446ac18ab624adae023bb7e193d05ad
enrichment payload sha256
2a78cd1715577e1069d361b57c3a21cf9615d4932c01b927e61ceaed2f3b22fc
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/ee15dbdeee1d0d4a0d2733ab6360e730c9b67ba354081bc9f507ed6ebc8220f0/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
ad54f6d83b8feea6f8c97c9d9cf03ee92d3d732ff5fa4dee59ca5dea37d86efe

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextinsufficient context
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responseinsufficient context
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: ee15dbdeee1d0d4a0d2733ab6360e730c9b67ba354081bc9f507ed6ebc8220f0
Decision: 710d48031e757a9330765b3b1f042d45ba4bf14be4ec53d6932cd7306f14cd88
Base reviewed revision: 92d8829e3c2876ffe7eb13c7025276978a6a4a679029a7cd6db6a5a06c46c762

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.