Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

I fell for a charming ‘army colonel’ on Tinder — I found out the terrifying truth and it cost me $25K

nypost.comEnglishObserved 2024-11-18
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

Story groups for this report

Contextual research groupings, not verified case membership.

How to read this record

Own UKwomanTinder claimedUSarmycolonel falseRomance andsourcehyperrealisticAIvideos25Ktitle/over20Kdesc. Preserveamountcomparison, currencyrouteunspecified, noNikkiidentity/clinicaldiagnosis oractualUSoperatorcountry. AIclaim sourceattributed notindependenttechnicalverification.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
5efdc2fd6c778b2689dbc26bc014e30503a18e15f5f8e7e87e7f90cefc3fbed9
current source binding
input hash
43e2fca089ec24b16f3892b308301f9a3bdae2b54ac9f7aa9b893ee0f6f10f7f
decision id
e7610230ca6d7cf5fc3ba8cfef2b0cef487856b8f1f754d0ae24895ec6c05f7a
document id
f9d263ddcae437c5c25c350736a3a4e7ce81e4da1601a72542ca2ae4121e4bfa
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
5c0f76d704b820af621cfc75638bbc06efffffe1c623fd11c77c8884907ef42d
finding evidence sha256
bbc6a0c7cb167d535dcf5b184d2426ee8e8e5fc65754153eea76e72c73080523
enrichment payload sha256
34041d6691b0782095ca3ec9fd032649ca4e9dc39b66521361784914f53561de
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/f9d263ddcae437c5c25c350736a3a4e7ce81e4da1601a72542ca2ae4121e4bfa/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
88d49356cb73261921b98411516d77ead466dc405e26cecaca3c9a044467fda1

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

ai synthetic mediareported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressinsufficient context
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: f9d263ddcae437c5c25c350736a3a4e7ce81e4da1601a72542ca2ae4121e4bfa
Decision: e7610230ca6d7cf5fc3ba8cfef2b0cef487856b8f1f754d0ae24895ec6c05f7a
Base reviewed revision: 5efdc2fd6c778b2689dbc26bc014e30503a18e15f5f8e7e87e7f90cefc3fbed9

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.