Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

Online dating scam: Man held hostage for multiple days in Amsterdam

nltimes.nlEnglishObserved 2024-05-29
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own Amsterdam-police report says a52-year-old man arranged a dating-site meeting, was held hostage for several days by two armed men and robbed of over23000EUR. Confinement and armed physical abuse are explicit; no sexual violence, psychological diagnosis, extortion demand, arrest, conviction or refund is supplied. Two men alone are not proof of an organized network; no recent/Tuesday year is filled. Exact own record W20240527_20240602C0105.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
title
reason
Own Amsterdam-police report says a52-year-old man arranged a dating-site meeting, was held hostage for several days by two armed men and robbed of over23000EUR. Confinement and armed physical abuse are explicit; no sexual violence, psychological diagnosis, extortion demand, arrest, conviction or refund is supplied. Two men alone are not proof of an organized network; no recent/Tuesday year is filled.
subject
own reported source subjects
subject basis
own_generic_subject
reported outcome
bounded own-source interpretation; unsupported facts withheld
subject name literals
No listed value
is entire code dimension denial
false
subject label has no borrowed name
true
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
reported_loss
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
5c69e39f4bfe99e063dd75cb76844a4ff797a615570dd62087e594b0479adab9
current source binding
input hash
1e54e2e3b884bfb80c73172981983268e7ca2149994a2792156242b43d2f1e69
decision id
91f608960b641118150c88bf1e057bc2045645add881dceff97a4cf9902e3db4
document id
fc87b1eb7121f3f1bd6fed8f6e31f1c15dbb5c91f561e7327791b23dea599731
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
b468f8ff46907fdb89ea1d0260e9b8eafb7728b76bf64002440e5f932847018e
finding evidence sha256
d43336e8938bf16b0ef168c2e4f92747d57c9cf0dca3a767973c520286da0fca
enrichment payload sha256
c3f38ab381583f24dbcab03e785224a58b9f070ebb67feb72055f30eb4eee2b9
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/fc87b1eb7121f3f1bd6fed8f6e31f1c15dbb5c91f561e7327791b23dea599731/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
4a51bcabe23f437de2a474cef181e30d9be51a4eabb9f60d2313cf282d6fbc4a

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

cashallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Involvement in other offending

other theftallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Coercion and exploitation

confinementreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Physical or sexual harm

physical abusereported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: unclear
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsnot reported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationreported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionnot reported in available text
Physical or sexual harmreported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of laborinsufficient context
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingreported in available text
Continued or renewed targetingnot reported in available text
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemenot reported in available text

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: fc87b1eb7121f3f1bd6fed8f6e31f1c15dbb5c91f561e7327791b23dea599731
Decision: 91f608960b641118150c88bf1e057bc2045645add881dceff97a4cf9902e3db4
Base reviewed revision: 5c69e39f4bfe99e063dd75cb76844a4ff797a615570dd62087e594b0479adab9

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.