Skip to main content

Deconstructing a form of hybrid investment fraud: Examining ‘pig butchering’ in the United States

Marie-Helen Maras ; Emily R. Ives (2024) — Journal of Economic Criminology

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The study used exploratory qualitative case-study analysis of 1,314 NexisUni news reports and court documents dated January 1, 2018-November 1, 2023. Searches used pig-butchering transliterations and combined romance, investment, cryptocurrency, confidence, trust-based, and catfishing terms. Domain spoofing was used to induce targets to download fraudulent apps or access fraudulent investment websites controlled by offenders. Hybrid investment fraud included romance-and-cryptocurrency schemes as well as friendship- and professional-relationship schemes. The 59 cases are not representative of all U.S. hybrid investment fraud.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies a dearth of U.S. academic research on pig butchering/hybrid investment fraud, especially on victim and offender characteristics and perpetration methods. It also finds that inconsistent, limiting terminology complicates case identification and can exclude friendship/professional-relationship and non-cryptocurrency cases. Existing fraud typologies do not adequately capture multidimensional hybrid fraud.

Methods

Exploratory qualitative case-study analysis of 1,314 NexisUni news reports and court documents dated January 1, 2018–November 1, 2023. Searches used pig-butchering transliterations and combined romance, investment, cryptocurrency, confidence, trust-based, and catfishing terms. The authors retained 59 distinct U.S.-victim cases (24 court-document and 35 news cases), coded fraud type, losses, duration, victim/offender information, and tactics/tools/MO, and used independent coding, discussion, and final quality checks to address intercoder consistency.

Limitations

The 59 cases are not representative of all U.S. hybrid investment fraud. Case identification was difficult because “pig butchering” was inconsistently used and alternative labels were narrow. Information was dispersed across news and administrative, civil, and criminal documents. Results depended on search dates, terms, exclusion decisions, available document detail, and the study period. Private legal-database content changes over time, and even identical NexisUni searches produced varying result counts.

Future Work

Future research should examine hybrid investment fraud beyond romance and cryptocurrency-only cases; develop more diverse, regionally and globally varied empirical data; modify fraud typologies to capture hybrid fraud; and use consistent terminology, particularly “hybrid investment fraud,” to improve identification and study of the phenomenon.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.