Skip to main content

Amor, dependencia y aislamiento: El impacto psicológico del romance scam

Pacheco Unguetti, Antonia Pilar ; Miranda Gálvez, Azahara Leonor (2025) — Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Source monitoring coverage

Checked Sep 12, 2026 01:08 UTC — no notice found.

DataCite identity and deposited events checked. DataCite incoming relationships checked. Zenodo record and latest version checked. No explicit source-update notice identified in the checked information. Coverage is incomplete and does not certify source validity. Routine version changes do not trigger writing.

Preserved document matched to repository version: 10.5281/zenodo.17965514.

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This record offers a general and neutral view of the phenomenon known as romance scam, with an emphasis on the triad between love, emotional dependence and social isolation. The dynamics of seduction, deception and manipulation that can affect one's perception of oneself and emotional well-being are explored. Relevant psychological processes are described, such as the intensification of affections, the building of trust and the subsequent breakdown of that trust in the face of signs of fraud. The analysis considers the pathways by which people can become vulnerable, including closing social circles, idealizing long-distance relationships, and seeking emotional validation. Impacts on self-efficacy, emotional regulation and sense of personal security are highlighted, as well as possible repercussions on future relationships and the perception of reality. The paper addresses theoretical approaches and lines of research to understand these experiences, and discusses implications for clinical intervention, digital education, and prevention. Considerations on risk assessment, victim support, and recovery strategies are presented, without presenting specific empirical data. The material is aimed at readers of psychology, public health and social intervention, as well as communities and platforms that manage risks in digital environments. Taken together, it offers a conceptual framework for understanding the psychological impact of romance scam, identifying red flags, and supporting responses that promote resilience and the repair of affective trust.

Identified Gaps

Persistent needs remain for specific training for professionals on the complex psychological consequences of romance fraud. The lack of exact figures in Spain and underreporting linked to shame and guilt make it difficult to know the true scale. The cross-border nature of the crime, legal and resource differences between countries, and technological evolution hinder a coordinated response.

Methods

A narrative synthesis chapter focused mainly on victims, integrating cited literature on scammer profiles and rationalizations, romance-scam mechanisms, vulnerabilities, consequences, and interventions. It does not describe original data collection, sampling, empirical analysis, or a systematic review protocol.

Limitations

The text does not report a search method, inclusion criteria, study-quality assessment, or primary data, so its claims depend on the cited literature. Several conclusions about victim profiles are presented as trends and may be affected by studies conducted with people who had already been scammed and isolated. Underreporting also limits estimation of incidence.

Future Work

More research is needed on scammers' tactics, the development of public policies to protect victims, improved identity verification on platforms, and greater public awareness. Specialized training is also proposed for professionals serving victims, along with more effective international cooperation.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.