Skip to main content

Online Romance Fraud as a Form of Emotional and Economic Partner Violence: A Social-Ecological Framework of Enabling Factors

Maja Feng (2025) — Nordic Journal of Studies in Policing

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.18261/njsp.12.2.4 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Norway
Tags:   AI Deepfakes, Coercive Control, Cyber Enabled Fraud, Nordic Context, Nordic Prevention, Norway, Prevention, Romance Scams, Routine Activity Theory, Social Ecological Framework, Trust, Victimization
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
Online Romance Fraud as a Form of Emotional and Economic Partner Violence: A Social-Ecological Framework of Enabling Factors analyzes online romance fraud (ORF) as a hybrid of cyber-enabled financial crime and intimate partner violence dynamics. The study aims to describe ORF and identify enabling factors that contribute to susceptibility and victimization, with a focus on Nordic and Norwegian contexts. Guided by the social-ecological framework and routine activity theory, the author draws on scholarly and grey literature and employs a scoping-review approach, supplemented by additional searches. The analysis centers on 39 publications and presents a holistic framework intended to inform prevention, policing, and policy in multifaceted environments. At the core, ORF involves grooming and the development of trust within online relationships to extract financial and emotional gains from victims. The article notes that the phenomenon yields a “double hit” of financial loss and psychological harm, sometimes extending into identity and money-mule schemes. Enabling factors are mapped across levels: at the individual level, characteristics such as gender, age, socioeconomic status, and emotional vulnerabilities influence risk; at the micro level, relational behaviors mirror coercive control and forms of abuse seen in domestic violence and intimate partner violence. The discussion situates ORF within broader social, cultural, digital, and economic contexts, and draws parallels with tech-enabled abuse to argue for a comprehensive, multilevel prevention approach. The author advocates a holistic, social-ecological approach to crime prevention and policing, emphasizing collaboration across agencies and sectors, including financial institutions, to disrupt ORF at multiple levels. The Nordic context shapes the framing, with calls for stronger interorganisational cooperation and better policing knowledge of manipulation processes. The article positions ORF as a hybrid crime requiring empirically grounded, multilevel interventions and future research to refine enabling-factor pathways and preventive strategies.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The paper identifies a lack of holistic theoretical models for understanding ORF enabling factors. Research on ORF victim support groups is limited. Police knowledge and information about fraud in Norway are described as insufficient, impeding prevention. The proposed conceptual parallels between ORF, domestic violence, coercive control, and intimate partner violence require empirical investigation, while retaining conceptual specificity for prevention.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
Exploratory, theoretically guided literature analysis of scholarly and grey literature, rather than a systematic or scoping review. It used a pre-registered scoping-review search across academic and grey-literature databases, supplemented by snowballing, citation chaining, and ad hoc searches. The author screened and preliminarily coded 141 records from the first source and 31 from supplementary searches; 39 publications were included. Findings were thematically organised in NVivo and EndNote using social-ecological and routine activity theory frameworks.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The article explicitly presents an exploratory and extensive overview rather than a scoping or systematic review. Its included literature was selected for relevance to ORF susceptibility, victimisation, and victim–fraudster dynamics, with primary emphasis on victims rather than fraudster perspectives. Consequently, the framework is an initial, literature-based conceptualisation that the author says requires empirical investigation. Integrating concepts from ORF and abuse research may also reduce specificity and relevance for target groups if applied uncritically.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Empirically investigate the article’s initial conceptualisation of ORF and its proposed multilevel enabling factors. Examine temporal macro-structures that create conditions for cyber-enabled crime, and test how factors interact across individual, relational, institutional, societal, and global levels. Research should also assess the influence and impact of ORF victim support groups and support development of effective preventive interventions.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.