Skip to main content

My Parents Expectations Were Overwhelming: Online Dating Romance Scams Targeting Minors in Iran Through Exploitation of Parental Pressure

Amirkhani, Sima ; Alizadeh, Mahla Fatemeh ; Randall, Dave ; Stevens, Gunnar ; Zytko, Douglas (2026) — Publication Server of Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences (Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences)

Source monitoring coverage

Checked Sep 26, 2026 03:15 UTC — no notice found.

DataCite identity and deposited events checked. DataCite incoming relationships checked. arXiv submission history checked. No explicit source-update notice identified in the checked information. Coverage is incomplete and does not certify source validity. Routine version changes do not trigger writing.

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
4
Average per calendar year
Too new for an annual average

Count checked .

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The study used episodic narrative interviews with 16 Iranian adults who had experienced online dating romance scams while aged under 18. Participants, aged 14-17 at victimization, were recruited through a Persian-language Instagram account focused on romance (11) and personal networks (5). The lack of parental support was associated with enduring distress, insomnia, poor academic performance, family conflict, and, in one case, multiple suicide attempts. No participant felt safe disclosing the romantic relationship to parents, allowing scams to continue for months or years without parental intervention. The sample was recruited largely through a romance-themed Instagram account and personal networks, which may bias participation toward people more comfortable discussing romance scams.

Identified Gaps

Romance-scam research has disproportionately examined middle-aged women in Western countries, leaving minors and non-Western cultural settings underexplored. The paper identifies little knowledge of how minors in restrictive environments, where premarital romance is taboo and early marriage is normalized, navigate online romantic advances. It also notes that HCI research on youth harm emphasizes grooming, solicitation, and sextortion rather than sustained, fraud-based romantic exploitation.

Methods

The study used episodic narrative interviews with 16 Iranian adults who had experienced online dating romance scams while aged under 18. Participants, aged 14–17 at victimization, were recruited through a Persian-language Instagram account focused on romance (11) and personal networks (5). Remote Persian-language text or voice interviews lasted 40 minutes to 2.5 hours. Transcripts were translated into English and analyzed using inductive and deductive qualitative content analysis.

Limitations

The sample was recruited largely through a romance-themed Instagram account and personal networks, which may bias participation toward people more comfortable discussing romance scams. Recruitment was constrained by Iran’s limited research infrastructure and legal and political risks surrounding sexuality and premarital relationships. Accounts were retrospective because all participants were adults at interview, and findings reflect a small, hard-to-reach qualitative sample rather than prevalence or causal estimates.

Future Work

Future research should foreground local cultural context when studying and designing responses to technology-mediated harms against minors. The paper also identifies a need for further research on how authoritarian parenting shapes minors’ romantic behaviour and decision-making online, and for platforms and policymakers to develop culturally responsive digital-resilience and protection measures.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.