Skip to main content

LOVE SCAMS ISSUES IN MALAYSIA: HOW TO OVERCOME IT FROM AN ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE

Ameera Ismail ; Hanin Hazwani Suhardi ; Balqis Mohd Ramli ; Fatin Nabilah Mohd Yunus ; Wan Noor Hazlina Wan Jusoh (2023) — International Journal of Law, Government and Communication

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The publication examines love scams in Malaysia and evaluates potential remedies from an Islamic perspective. Its stated aim is to identify factors driving the phenomenon, the impacts on victims and families, and Islamicly grounded solutions to prevent and mitigate harm. The authors conduct a library-based, conceptual analysis of literature from 2005 to 2022 to explore how social media, online dating services, and related behavioral dynamics have facilitated romance fraud, with a focus on how scammers build trust and elicit financial transfers. The study identifies several interrelated factors. Widespread and increasingly active social media use, the popularity of dating apps, and the ease of concealing identities on the internet are highlighted as enabling conditions for love scams. Victims are described as often being professional, highly educated women who are single and financially well-off, though other vulnerable groups are discussed. Loneliness, emotional needs, and social isolation are noted as contributing personal-context factors. The research also outlines the typical scam trajectory, including profile fabrication, grooming, requests for money, and shifting personas, and it notes associated consequences such as substantial financial losses, psychological distress, and strained family relationships, along with risks to personal data security. From an Islamic perspective, the authors propose solutions centered on spiritual and social safeguards: strengthening ties with family and faith, avoiding excessive time on the internet for dating, personal moral cultivation, prayer and Qur’anic recitation, and closer approximation to Allah. They also call for broader societal measures, including public awareness, NGO efforts, and stricter penalties to deter offenders. The paper frames these recommendations as preventive and restorative, while acknowledging that its conclusions rest on a synthesis of existing literature rather than new empirical findings.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies a gap in examining love-scam factors, impacts, and solutions through an Islamic perspective. It does not provide empirical evaluation of whether the proposed religious, family, awareness, or government measures reduce victimization or harm.

Methods

This conceptual paper uses library research. It reviews literature published from 2005 to 2022, especially literature concerning women, to synthesize factors, impacts, and Islamic-perspective solutions related to love scams in Malaysia. It also draws on reported Malaysian case and loss statistics.

Limitations

The article is a literature-based conceptual discussion and reports no original participant sample, data collection, analytic protocol, or outcome evaluation. Many claims are synthesized from prior studies, news reports, and cited cases; therefore, the proposed solutions are not empirically tested within this paper.

Future Work

Evaluate whether Islamic-perspective guidance, family support, public awareness materials, and reduced risky social-media use prevent victimization or improve recovery. Assess the effectiveness of NGO campaigns describing scam tactics and of intensified arrests and heavier penalties. Primary research with victims and practitioners could test the paper's literature-based claims.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.