Skip to main content

Online love fraud and the experiences of indonesian women: a qualitative study

Susanti Niman ; Tina Shinta Parulian ; Timothy Rothhaar (2023) — International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS)

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
17
Average per calendar year
4.3

Count checked .

17 citations ÷ 4 calendar years (2023–2026). The first and last years may be partial. This is a lifetime average, not a year-by-year citation history.

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This publication presents a qualitative, phenomenological examination of Indonesian women who experienced online love fraud. It aims to illuminate the psychosocial impact of such scams on victims, focusing on how deception and coercive requests for money and intimate images affect their mental health, self-view, and social standing. The study gathers first-person narratives through semi-structured interviews conducted via video chat, analyzing the transcripts to identify recurring experiences and emotional responses described by participants. Across the narratives, the authors report a cluster of interrelated psychosocial responses associated with online love fraud. Victims describe shock at discovering they were deceived, followed by sadness, anger, and episodes of low self-esteem linked to loss of money and personal images. Anxiety arises from threats to reveal intimate materials or to disrupt family and work life, and some participants recount suicidal thoughts as a possible consequence of the abuse and social blame. The discussion connects these experiences to broader themes of love, vulnerability, and gendered expectations, and it concludes that professional mental health support and social assistance are needed to aid recovery. The authors also suggest policy and practice implications for addressing cybercrime harms and supporting victims, while calling for further inquiry into effective mental health interventions.

Identified Gaps

The paper identifies limited research on love-scam victims' experiences and argues that victims in Indonesia receive insufficient attention and empathy. It supplies qualitative evidence of psychosocial effects, but leaves the effectiveness of mental health interventions for this population untested.

Methods

This qualitative hermeneutic phenomenology study used purposive sampling to recruit 12 Indonesian women who had experienced financial loss from online love fraud and sought help from an anti-scam community. Researchers conducted 60–90 minute recorded video-call semi-structured interviews, transcribed them verbatim, and iteratively read, coded, and organized accounts into themes.

Limitations

The study's purposive sample was limited to 12 women aged 25–45 who had sought assistance from an anti-scam community. Findings therefore reflect a small, help-seeking Indonesian female survivor group and may not represent male victims, victims who do not seek support, or other settings. The supplied text does not report a comparative group or outcome evaluation.

Future Work

Evaluate whether mental health interventions improve the psychological well-being of online love-scam victims. Research could also assess how professional mental health care, psychotherapy, family support, group support, and community support contribute to recovery.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.