Skip to main content

Introduction to Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Fraud and Crime

Jason Scharfman (2023) — The Cryptocurrency and Digital Asset Fraud Casebook

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

The publication offers a structured survey of fraud and crime in the cryptocurrency and digital asset space, aiming to raise awareness of how scams arise as the technology and markets expand. It describes a broad landscape of threats, from exchange hacks and rug pulls to Ponzi schemes, NFT fraud, and misrepresentation in ICOs and token sales, and it places these issues in a historical context by relating them to traditional fraud patterns. Its approach centers on interpretive analysis of widely documented case studies. Early chapters set out fraud typologies and motivations, then explore specific incidents across centralized and decentralized exchanges, Ponzi and MLM structures, NFT markets, DeFi platforms, and crypto hedge funds. The work combines technical explanations of platforms and protocols with narrative examinations of notable schemes, including well-known exchange breaches, insider promotions, and celebrity-endorsed offerings. The text also emphasizes regulatory and enforcement perspectives, illustrating how securities laws and anti-fraud provisions have been applied to digital assets in several high-profile actions. While it catalogs numerous fraud archetypes and concrete cases, the edition notes ongoing limitations in regulation, oversight, and market protections, underscoring the need for vigilance among participants and practitioners. Overall, the publication presents a catalogued, case-driven panorama intended to inform professionals and students about the evolution of crypto fraud and the practical implications for governance and risk management.

Identified Gaps

Cryptocurrency fraud statistics likely understate the true scale because most crypto-related crime is self-reported. The text also identifies an unresolved prevention gap: criminals may become more sophisticated faster than investors, exchanges, law enforcement, prosecutors, and regulators, while crypto asset recovery can be more difficult than recovery of fiat assets.

Methods

This casebook provides a descriptive, secondary-source synthesis of cryptocurrency fraud. It defines fraud concepts, reports complaint and loss statistics, summarizes government and industry materials, and presents illustrative case studies of romance scams, pig-butchering scams, exchange hacks, Ponzi schemes, and other crypto frauds. It does not report an original empirical study design or systematic evidence-review protocol.

Limitations

The work is a descriptive casebook rather than a primary empirical study. Its examples and statistics rely substantially on reported complaints, press releases, media accounts, and external reports. Reported crypto-crime figures are likely undercounts because most crime is self-reported. Some criminal-case descriptions are allegations rather than adjudicated findings.

Future Work

Develop lessons learned and best-practice recommendations to reduce the risk of future cryptocurrency exchange hacks. The text also calls for future practices that make the crypto ecosystem safer and for assessing whether regulatory resources, security controls, and consumer-protection measures can deter fraud.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.