Skip to main content

Cybercrime through love scams: what women should know?

Farah Safura Muhammad ; Hamizah Muhammad (2022) — Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
13
Average per calendar year
2.6

Count checked .

13 citations ÷ 5 calendar years (2022–2026). The first and last years may be partial. This is a lifetime average, not a year-by-year citation history.

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This publication presents a conceptual study that examines cybercrime through love scams, with a focus on women as a potentially vulnerable group. It situates the issue within broader technological and societal changes, noting that the shift to virtual work and transactions during the COVID-19 era has heightened global cyber risks. The authors describe scammers’ modus operandi in two main forms: monetary deception and recruitment by militants, outlining how these schemes operate and the tactics used to lure victims. The article then analyzes factors that may lead women to become targets, considering personality aspects, individual characteristics, and the broader context in which victimization occurs. It discusses the potential impacts on women after being deceived, emphasizing emotional and financial consequences, and the ongoing challenges that can follow such experiences. The study frames these elements as interrelated considerations that influence vulnerability and the aftermath of contact with scammers. In its conclusions, the authors advocate for precautionary steps to reduce the likelihood of becoming victims and for coping strategies to address the consequences if victimization occurs. The emphasis is on practical measures to enhance awareness and resilience, rather than on general commentary. Overall, the article situates love scams within contemporary cybercrime, highlighting specific pathways that may affect women and stressing the importance of targeted prevention and response efforts.

Identified Gaps

The paper synthesizes prior literature and reported cases but does not provide original data on Malaysian women’s experiences, the prevalence of specific tactics, or the effectiveness of recommended precautions. It also combines romance fraud with Daesh recruitment, leaving limited direct comparison of their distinct targeting processes and harms.

Methods

This is a conceptual, literature-based study. The first author gathered literature and wrote the paper; the coauthor analyzed documents and reviewed it. The paper synthesizes published studies, official Malaysian statistics, news cases, and secondary accounts to describe love-scam tactics, women’s victimization factors, harms, and precautionary actions.

Limitations

The article presents no original participant data, sampling procedure, systematic review protocol, or outcome evaluation. Many claims are drawn from prior studies, official reports, and illustrative cases. Its broad treatment of cybercrime and militant recruitment alongside romance scams limits the specificity of conclusions about financial romance fraud.

Future Work

Future research should empirically test the proposed victimization factors, scammer stages, and recommended safety and reporting measures among women using online dating and social-media platforms. Research should also distinguish financially motivated romance scams from extremist recruitment, which are discussed together here but involve different outcomes and mechanisms.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.