Skip to main content

Understanding the state of criminological scholarship on cybercrimes

Thomas J. Holt (2022) — Computers in Human Behavior

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
69
Average per calendar year
13.8

Count checked .

69 citations ÷ 5 calendar years (2022–2026). The first and last years may be partial. This is a lifetime average, not a year-by-year citation history.

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107493 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   Global
Tags:   Cross National Research, Cybercrime, Fraud Measurement, Longitudinal Research, Online Fraud, Policing, Romance Scams, Victimization
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This publication is a review of criminological research on cybercrimes, examining how scholars have studied hacking, malware, fraud, piracy, and related offenses that are economically motivated or involve data, finances, and persons in online spaces. It notes that criminologists have produced a large and growing body of work over the past decade, with an emphasis on behavioral, attitudinal, and environmental factors that help explain why individuals engage in online offenses. The article traces methodological variety, including survey studies (from college samples to national youth panels), the use of honeypots and live-system experiments, analyses of open-source hacking incidents, and examinations of illicit online markets on both Open and Dark Web platforms. It also highlights intersections with social science and computer science approaches. Key themes identified include the predictive role of social bonds, peer associations, and individual self-control for cyberdeviance; the influence of deterrence messaging and organizational information security policies; and the complex dynamics of illicit digital markets, phishing, data theft, and piracy. The review summarizes how researchers have explored the market practices, victimization, policing responses, and legal proceedings related to cybercrime, noting mixed but emerging evidence on deterrence, sanctions, and the impact of policing interventions. It also highlights gaps and limitations, such as uneven data quality, limited cross-national generalizability, and the need for continued study of victims, policymakers, and the evolving structure of cybercrime markets as technology and enforcement environments change. Overall, the article presents a state-of-the-field assessment and points to directions for future criminological inquiry.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Romance-fraud research has few consistent victimization predictors and limited evidence on risk factors in international contexts. Fraud and phishing measures are inconsistent, weakening comparisons across population surveys. Cybercrime research has few longitudinal studies, particularly involving young people, and official statistics undercount economically motivated offenses. Evidence on policing, public-private coordination, and judicial responses is limited and often based on nonrepresentative samples.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
Narrative review of criminological scholarship on cyber-trespass and cyber-deception/theft offenses, including hacking, malware, fraud, piracy, and online illicit markets. It synthesizes findings from prior survey, qualitative, quantitative, open-source, experimental, interview, ethnographic, police-data, and market-content studies. The review identifies methodological limitations and future research priorities; it does not report new data collection or a systematic review protocol.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
This is a broad narrative review rather than original empirical research, and no review-search, screening, or quality-appraisal procedure is reported in the supplied text. Romance fraud is one subsection within a wider review of cybercrime. The article also notes that much underlying evidence is preliminary, inconsistently measured, underreported in official data, or based on samples not generalizable to broader populations or police forces.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Develop internationally comparable research on romance-fraud victimization risk factors. Improve and standardize measures of fraud, phishing, offending, and victimization, including distinctions between simple and complex cybercrime. Conduct longitudinal studies, especially among young people, to identify developmental pathways. Improve trend monitoring while official statistics remain incomplete. Examine policing, specialist units, public-private coordination, and cross-national judicial responses.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.