Skip to main content

Loving strangers, avoiding risks: Online dating practices and scams among Chinese lesbian ( lala ) women

Han Tao (2022) — Media, Culture & Society

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
29
Average per calendar year
5.8

Count checked .

29 citations ÷ 5 calendar years (2022–2026). The first and last years may be partial. This is a lifetime average, not a year-by-year citation history.

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1177/01634437221088952 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   China
Tags:   AI-Enabled Fraud, Chinese Lesbian Women, Douban, Online Anonymity, Online Dating, Pig Butchering, Platform Policy, Romance Scams, Trust, Wechat
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This publication examines how Chinese lesbian/lala women use online spaces to seek long-term intimate relationships amid rapid economic reforms and a shifting moral landscape. Tao analyzes online dating experiences through 16 in-depth interviews and ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Guangdong between 2018 and 2019, complemented by virtual observation on Douban Group and WeChat. The study centers on two digital platforms, Douban Group’s “les sky” and the WeChat ecosystem, and situates online dating within broader concerns about trust, anonymity, and the social boundaries between strangers and kin. The author shows that online anonymity and “stranger sociality” produce both opportunities and risks for queer women. Respondents prize the ability to connect with others who share similar cultural tastes and social backgrounds, yet they increasingly judge potential partners by indicators of “suzhi” (quality) and moral reputation. At the same time, online dating is viewed as uncertain and sometimes dangerous, notably due to romance scams such as Shazhu Pan pig-butchering and Mai Chaye schemes, which have targeted lesbian communities and often involve fabricated personal histories, false socioeconomic claims, or marital status. The research also documents tensions around privacy, coming out, and the strategic masking of status (married or parent) to improve dating chances, as well as the complexity of forming conjugal bonds that are reliable and emotionally meaningful. In conclusion, online queer spaces can both enable and constrain new forms of intimacy for lesbian/lala women in urban China. The findings highlight how morality, social status, and trust are negotiated under neoliberal pressures and state-influenced modernity, with online anonymity offering protection but also creating conditions for deception. The study notes that online platforms are not simply erotic spaces or cultural clubs, but dynamic sites where risk, vulnerability, and the pursuit of reliable love intersect in contemporary Chinese queer life.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
Research on lesbian online dating in mainland China is described as especially sparse, and risks faced by Chinese lesbian/lala women are rarely acknowledged. The paper also notes that queer victims of online love scams receive little public and police attention. Evidence is needed beyond this urban Guangdong sample to assess how scam experiences, reporting, and platform protections vary across queer populations and settings.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
Qualitative ethnographic study in Guangdong Province, China, conducted from June 2018 to July 2019. The author used 16 in-depth interviews, virtual participant observation on WeChat and Douban Group, participation in a Guangzhou lesbian WeChat group and three offline gatherings, and ongoing friendship-based engagement. Participants were recruited through WeChat and the lesbian-themed Douban group “les sky.”

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The study draws on 16 respondents aged 22–36 living in Shenzhen or Guangzhou, recruited from WeChat and Douban lesbian networks. Its findings therefore provide contextual qualitative accounts rather than prevalence estimates or broadly representative evidence about Chinese lesbian/lala women, online fraud victims, or queer communities outside urban Guangdong. Scam accounts also include forum narratives and field observations rather than independently verified case records.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Further research should examine how same-sex platforms can address their perceived unreliability, including identity verification and background-check mechanisms, while protecting queer users' privacy. Research should also investigate the limited public and police attention to online love scams affecting queer people.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.