Skip to main content

Online Romance Scammers

Lauren R. Shapiro (2022) — Cyberpredators and Their Prey

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

The record is approved for public display, but a complete historical administrator action is not recorded.

Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This book chapter presents online romance scams as cyber-enabled imposter and advance-fee fraud that may be committed by an individual or a coordinated group, usually for financial gain. It is an overview rather than a reported original study. The chapter is organized around definitions, typical offenders and victims, offender motives and methods, laws used in prosecution, harms to victims and society, and cybersecurity responses. That structure supports a broad introduction to the crime, but the accessible publisher preview does not identify a sample, analytic method, or empirical results. Claims beyond the chapter's stated scope therefore should not be inferred from this synopsis.

Identified Gaps

Key evidence gaps include substantial underreporting, because law enforcement is reportedly uninvolved in 75%–80% of cases; uncertainty about the proportion of offenders located in the United States versus elsewhere; and an unknown number of victims who experience the optional stage involving coercion into crimes. These gaps limit prevalence estimates, offender-location knowledge, and understanding of severe exploitation pathways.

Methods

This is a narrative, practice-oriented book chapter that synthesizes cited academic studies, government and law-enforcement reports, complaint statistics, legal statutes, and prosecution case examples. It describes scam definitions, offender tactics, victim patterns, harms, U.S. legal remedies, and cybersecurity detection guidance. It also summarizes prior profile-analysis research, including machine-learning and natural-language-processing findings.

Limitations

The chapter appears to be a secondary-source synthesis rather than a primary empirical study. It does not report a systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, sampling procedure, or independent statistical analysis. Many prevalence, offender, and victim claims rely on prior reports and cited studies, while complaint data are affected by substantial nonreporting. Some descriptions of typical offenders and victims may therefore be context-dependent rather than universally representative.

Future Work

Future research should quantify the unknown prevalence of victims who reach the optional coercion-and-accomplice stage, improve estimates obscured by nonreporting, and evaluate whether profile-based machine-learning and reverse-image-search guidance prevent victimization. Cross-national research could also establish the geographic distribution of offenders, which the chapter states is difficult to determine.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.