Skip to main content

"Society Encourages the Killing of Girls Like Me": Layers of Victimization in Online Dating Romance Scams in Iran That Target Sexual Access Over Financial Gain

Sima Amirkhani ; Mahla Alizadeh ; Dave Randall ; Gunnar Stevens ; Douglas Zytko (2025) — Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This publication investigates online dating romance scams in Iran, focusing on how cultural, legal, and familial dynamics shape scammer tactics and victim experiences. The authors conducted narrative interviews with 20 self-identified female victims of romance scams in Iran, using Persian interviews that were translated to English for analysis. They frame premarital dating as highly taboo in Iran and examine how these conditions drive daters to seek secret online connections and how scammers adapt to local constraints. The central finding is that these scams are driven less by financial loss and more by sexual access to a woman’s body, a phenomenon the authors term “body scams.” Scammers exploit Iran’s cultural rules surrounding virginity, marriage, and family honor (Aberou), leveraging threats to disclose intimate material to a victim’s family, including her father, to coerce compliance with sexual demands. Victims face limited avenues for recourse; in many cases reporting to authorities or seeking family support could result in further punishment or violence, making silence and secrecy a rational, albeit dangerous, strategy. The analysis distinguishes body scams from money-focused scams common in Western contexts and argues that such non-Western dynamics require an expanded conceptualization of online dating romance scams. The authors conclude by discussing implications for research and practice, advocating broader, culturally informed definitions of romance scams and greater attention to local sociocultural factors in non-Western settings. They acknowledge limitations related to transferability beyond Iran and suggest directions for future cross-cultural study to better understand how similar dynamics may manifest in other societies. The study emphasizes the need to consider non-financial forms of exploitation when assessing online dating harms.

Identified Gaps

Prior empirical romance-scam research predominantly examines Western victims and African scammers, leaving limited knowledge of scams occurring wholly within non-Western cultures. Financial definitions of romance scams also overlook sexual access as an item of value and how local legal, familial, and cultural structures shape targeting, coercion, and victim recourse. Sexual abuse in online dating remains under-researched.

Methods

The study used qualitative narrative interviews with 20 self-identified Iranian online-dating romance-scam victims, all women aged 18–39 at interview. Participants were recruited through Instagram and Telegram and interviewed in Persian via WhatsApp, Telegram, or Instagram using voice or text. Interviews lasted 40 minutes to 2.5 hours, were transcribed and translated into English, and analyzed through inductive qualitative content analysis in MAXQDA, with iterative review by two additional researchers.

Limitations

Online interviews meant the researchers could not verify participants' accounts with complete certainty. The sample lacked gender diversity: all 20 participants identified as women, limiting conclusions about men, LGBTQ+ people, and other identities. Findings are grounded in Iran's specific social and legal context and may not transfer directly to other non-Western settings. Recruitment through romance-oriented Instagram and Telegram channels may also constrain the breadth of experiences represented.

Future Work

Study men, LGBTQ+ people, and self-identified perpetrators; develop a universally applicable definition of romance scams that includes body scams; evaluate anonymous, secure, culturally sensitive reporting systems on social media and dating platforms; examine trust-building, secrecy, anonymity, and psychological effects of repeated coercion across cultural contexts; and test whether Iranian findings transfer to other non-Western settings.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.