Skip to main content

Tackling Love Scams: A Review of the Role of the Police in Public Education

Anggraeni Angelia Isabela ; Indarto ; Halimah ; Albertus Wahyurudhanto (2025) — Journal of English Language and Education

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This study examines the role of the Indonesian National Police in public education as a preventive measure against love scams, a form of cybercrime that exploits romantic relationships for financial gain. The authors frame love scams as a growing global issue linked to emotional manipulation, with victims suffering financial losses, emotional distress, and potential mental health consequences. The research aims to understand how police-led education and community outreach can raise public awareness and deter such offenses. Using a qualitative, field-based approach, the researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 11 key informants from police units and community programs, supplemented by secondary sources such as case reports and policy materials. Data were analyzed through reduction, presentation, and verification steps to identify patterns related to the modus operandi of love scam perpetrators and the police’s educational interventions. The findings indicate that 18 identified love scam perpetrators were active in 2024, with reported losses from these cases reaching substantial amounts, including figures in rupiah and multiple foreign currencies. The study also documents the scale and variety of devices and dating platforms used by offenders to target victims. The authors describe several prevention efforts led by Korbinmas Baharkam POLRI, including counseling, socialization, community outreach, and partnerships with local governments and banks. They emphasize education that accounts for emotional factors and recommend collaborations with educational institutions, crisis intervention services, and sustained public awareness campaigns. The conclusion underscores education as a key component of reducing public vulnerability to love scams and calls for further development of culturally and emotionally informed preventive models.

Identified Gaps

Police community-development activities had no specific love-scam prevention effort and remained focused on general security. The paper also indicates that not all personnel understood love scams in depth, and no dedicated reporting platform or hotline existed exclusively for love scams.

Methods

Qualitative field study using in-depth interviews with 11 informants, including Indonesian police personnel, an NGO volunteer, and one love-scam victim. Researchers also used observations, case reports, policies, legislation, and publications. Analysis involved data reduction, data presentation through tables and narratives, and verification of conclusions.

Limitations

The study provides limited procedural detail on recruitment, interview questions, observation procedures, coding, and how validity was assessed beyond re-examining data. The interview sample is dominated by police personnel and includes only one victim, limiting the breadth of victim experience represented. Reported prevention effectiveness is largely discussed descriptively rather than evaluated with outcome measures.

Future Work

Future research should develop and assess education-model strategies tailored to different age groups and evolving technologies.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.