Skip to main content

Comprehensive Analysis of Online Social Network Frauds

Smita Bharne ; Pawan Bhaladhare (2023) — Advances in Data-Driven Computing and Intelligent Systems; Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 698

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools


              
              

Transparency

Evidence and review status

This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

Source basis
Downloaded PDF
Source updates
No notice found at last check
AI-generated page content
Yes
Automated checks
Passed
Administrative approval
Yes
Human content review
Not recorded
Subject-matter-expert review
Not recorded
How this was prepared
Source basis

RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.

  • PDF added to RSRC:
Source updates

No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.

  • Last source-status attempt:
AI-generated page content

AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.

  • Document analysis recorded:
  • Synopsis generation recorded:
  • Page record updated:
Automated checks

The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.

  • Checks completed:
View passed checks (3)
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
  • English-source lexical grounding check
Administrative approval

An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.

  • Approved for public display:
Human content review

No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.

Subject-matter-expert review

RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.

Review-state definitions
Found a possible error? Request a correction.

Synopsis

This publication presents a comprehensive analysis of frauds in online social networks (OSNs), focusing on how frauds arise from the open, highly connected nature of OSNs and the diverse ways users interact on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. It situates OSN fraud as a persistent cybercrime risk that targets adults, children, and women, and it surveys the landscape by outlining the purposes, harms, and observed trends behind various fraud types. The work combines a descriptive taxonomy with a synthesis of recent literature on detection, emphasizing machine learning (ML) as the leading data-driven approach while acknowledging the ongoing challenges posed by the complexity of OSNs. The authors categorize OSN frauds by their core intention, detailing six main classes: social engineering, human-targeted frauds, false identities, misinformation, and e-commerce/consumer frauds. Within these classes, they elaborate specific modalities such as social phishing, pretexting, baiting, cyberbullying, cyberstalking, cyber grooming, dating fraud, fake accounts, cloned and compromised accounts, and misinformation campaigns (fake news, rumors, and spam). A dedicated section describes e-commerce frauds (card testing, brand jacking, investment scams, and online shopping scams) and notes that investment and dating fraud, along with online shopping fraud, were prominent according to 2021 FTC reports. The interrelationship among OSN fraud, broader social-network threats, and cybercrime is framed to show overlapping risk structures. The chapter also surveys ML-based detection methods, summarizing various feature sets (profile, text content, and hybrid approaches) and reporting on a range of techniques used to identify fraudulent accounts, spammers, phishing sites, and related abuse. It concludes by comparing pros and cons of ML-driven detection, highlighting privacy concerns, data collection costs, and the ongoing need to improve detection, prevention, and control as OSNs evolve.

Identified Gaps

Despite substantial research, online social network fraud remains unresolved and new fraud types are expected. Machine-learning detection faces challenges from the complex nature of online social networks, privacy constraints on obtaining behavioral data, costly data collection, unreliable self-reported profile information, and text features that may miss interaction patterns.

Methods

This is a narrative, literature-based chapter. It classifies online social network fraud by fraud intent, summarizes reported global fraud statistics, describes dating fraud alongside other fraud categories, and reviews machine-learning detection studies. The review organizes detection methods by fraud type, algorithm, features, and dataset.

Limitations

The chapter notes that collecting profile and behavioral data can violate privacy and may require owner consent. Such data collection can be costly or time-consuming under privacy protections. Malicious users may submit false profile information, while text-based features may not capture interaction patterns, comment frequency, or likes.

Future Work

Detection, prevention, and control of online social network fraud should be continuously improved to address anticipated new forms of fraud. The chapter also identifies challenges in applying machine learning under privacy constraints and complex social-network environments.

See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.