source specific procedural contexts
- field
- desc
- reason
- Own financial-loss report not actual refund.
- subject
- Koriyama_target
- reported outcome
- complaint
- is entire code dimension denial
- false
Source statement flags
- source truth verified
- false
Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC
← Back to your resultsReported case
ロマンス詐欺2600万円被害 郡山の50代男性、SNSで投資勧められる:福島ニュース:福島民友新聞社
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Own Koriyama50male2600manJPY CASH/matchingappwomanSNSinvestment/Romance/policecomplaint. Notcrypto/yearfrom16th/actorname/conviction/refund.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Procedural context
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
- field
- desc
- reason
- Own Koriyama50male2600manJPY CASH/matchingappwomanSNSinvestment/Romance/policecomplaint. Notcrypto/yearfrom16th/actorname/conviction/refund.
- subject
- Aug12_unit_41
- reported outcome
- own_source_limits
- is entire code dimension denial
- false
Source statement flags
- source truth verified
- false
Reported developments
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
- role
- reported_development
- basis
- explicit
- field
- development
- scope
- article
- value
- reported_loss
- reason
- Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flags
No listed valueCurrent annotation provenance
The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.
- base version key
- 84a27d070bbc8e4865b5ccde62a9354bf0db613fbb5228ad3ebfc29e891b284c
- current source binding
- input hash
- 19212aa3bfc4fdcbface1753e32da42167f935eb0c2c3383af3903308dff3148
- decision id
- e09898b463edbf6cd89f3c146df08273ae0b8513a084f7d8a1a48146018ca674
- document id
- 7dc328f1b1375813544690604cea052d863ac78b52dfc6f65b7d151c5b63c642
- hash domain
- sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
- enrichment id
- cadc1aa986742074873cfb6bb522d85b4464dbf74b6399fe32a0ee1d73be8205
- finding evidence sha256
- 205d5bcde8b8be3c69ffc48284c9414dfeef3e39fd33786a174e7d5f53343b2f
- enrichment payload sha256
- 2e4e4febdb4c0d093e7793af60a2140dc560f2f0f2d82c878eb73840805c0db5
- approved delta ids
- No listed value
- provenance
- Item 1
- json pointer
- /source_map/records/7dc328f1b1375813544690604cea052d863ac78b52dfc6f65b7d151c5b63c642/annotation_binding
- artifact sha256
- 6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
- annotation key
- 41d9e6f3818da86914bae620240e5532d1bd2b1b18396d280d2f2261be75e739
Themes reported in the text
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Financial and property harm
cashallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Relationship-based deception
unspecifiedallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Investment pretext
investment tradingallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Technical facilitation
platform communicationreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- alleged offender
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
Help, reporting and prevention
reportreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
- Scope
- single case
- Person or institution described
- targeted person
- Link to romance fraud
- explicit
- Causal claim
- not established
All 24 assessed themes
| Theme | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Blame, stigma and responsibility framing | not reported in available text |
| Homicide and lethal violence | not reported in available text |
| Disruption of daily life | not reported in available text |
| Financial and property harm | reported in available text |
| Suicide and self-harm | not reported in available text |
| Family and social harm | not reported in available text |
| Protection or recovery of assets | not reported in available text |
| Policy and regulatory response | not reported in available text |
| Justice proceedings and outcomes | not reported in available text |
| Coercion and exploitation | not reported in available text |
| Psychological distress | insufficient context |
| Blackmail and extortion | not reported in available text |
| Help, reporting and prevention | reported in available text |
| Physical or sexual harm | not reported in available text |
| Investment pretext | reported in available text |
| Technical facilitation | reported in available text |
| Investigation and operational response | not reported in available text |
| Organization and division of labor | not reported in available text |
| Relationship-based deception | reported in available text |
| Involvement in other offending | not reported in available text |
| Continued or renewed targeting | not reported in available text |
| Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerability | not reported in available text |
| Institutional barriers or harmful response | not reported in available text |
| Moving money for a scheme | not reported in available text |
Connected reporting
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
Research provenance
1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 7dc328f1b1375813544690604cea052d863ac78b52dfc6f65b7d151c5b63c642
Decision: e09898b463edbf6cd89f3c146df08273ae0b8513a084f7d8a1a48146018ca674
Base reviewed revision: 84a27d070bbc8e4865b5ccde62a9354bf0db613fbb5228ad3ebfc29e891b284c
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.