Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.
How to read this record
Two Dajia bank incidents remain distinct: a proposed200000 gold-futures transfer and a54-year-old Hu woman's proposed500000 Romance payment. The own online-friend/father-ill headline supplies a financial-trust pretext, not verified illness. Bank staff noticed and reported/intercepted the attempted transfers; protected money is not paid loss, recovered money or an actual refund. Do not assign the gold investment to the Romance episode or fill year from day numbers.
Evidence basis: saved title description
Places in the available evidence
No geographic role could be established from the available text.
Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.
Current source qualifications
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
source specific current qualifications
field
desc
reason
Keep the proposed200000 gold-futures transfer separate from the54-year-old woman’s proposed500000 Romance payment. Bank interception protects funds; it is not repayment or a completed Romance-investment loss. Father illness in the headline is a pretext, not verified disease.
These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.
development assertions
role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
interception
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.
Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.
No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.
A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.
Record: 887658fbf06c25382c3aa934261dca9f89c3324b9f58e77425674137aed291d9 Decision: cd6efde92345fab5a67d31930340752e4d784f596e445bb7ff01c05cd927c6b3 Base reviewed revision: 41da3a6e21f5fd9528179d551edf34d738aa82d769de17255f7089866c87dcc7
The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.