Skip to main content

Data from The GDELT Project · Reviewed and interpreted by RSRC

← Back to your results

Reported case

高雄男遭愛情詐騙「匯款新加坡女網友」 警阻詐保他120萬積蓄 | ETtoday社會新聞 | ETtoday新聞雲

www.ettoday.netChinese (traditional)Observed 2024-08-10
Included for relevance; source claims are not independently verified. This record is based on saved titles and descriptions unless a separate deeper-reading assessment is explicitly shown. Observation dates are not incident dates. An arrest or charge is not a conviction.

How to read this record

Own KaohsiungXiaogang Shi41/claimedSingaporeLin/overmonthonline interaction and business-fund50000SGD≈120manTWD demand stopped bypolice. Requested cash-then-transfer and postalcard/PIN are attempted extraction/account-control request, not actualcarduse/paidloss/money-mule activity or refund. No earlierpayment/recontact to establish repeat-targeting; Singaporepersona not actualoperationcountry, no clinicalcause/year. Root prewrite qualification: generic 網路 supports unspecified digital route; no particular platform-communication class supplied. Requested card/PIN account-control dimensions remain separate. Root own-role qualification: Own50000SGD approximately1.2mTWD blockedrequest/ATMcard-password request, notpaidloss/refund/documentcrime. Singaporefalsewoman persona not actualoperationcountry.

Evidence basis: saved title description

Places in the available evidence

No geographic role could be established from the available text.

Unlisted locations remain unknown. Nationality, language and web address alone do not establish where a scam happened.

Procedural context

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific procedural contexts

field
desc
reason
Blocked SGD50000/about1.2mTWD and card/password request not paid loss, identitydocument crime or actual refund.
subject
planned_remittance
reported outcome
interception
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Current source qualifications

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

source specific current qualifications

field
desc
reason
Own KaohsiungXiaogang Shi41/claimedSingaporeLin/overmonthonline interaction and business-fund50000SGD≈120manTWD demand stopped bypolice. Requested cash-then-transfer and postalcard/PIN are attempted extraction/account-control request, not actualcarduse/paidloss/money-mule activity or refund. No earlierpayment/recontact to establish repeat-targeting; Singaporepersona not actualoperationcountry, no clinicalcause/year. Root prewrite qualification: generic 網路 supports unspecified digital route; no particular platform-communication class supplied. Requested card/PIN account-control dimensions remain separate. Root own-role qualification: Own50000SGD approximately1.2mTWD blockedrequest/ATMcard-password request, notpaidloss/refund/documentcrime. Singaporefalsewoman persona not actualoperationcountry.
subject
Aug05_unit_26
reported outcome
own_source_limits
is entire code dimension denial
false
Source statement flags
source truth verified
false

Reported developments

These attributed statements apply to their specified subjects and scope. They do not establish guilt, a whole-article denial, or an unstated outcome.

development assertions

role
reported_development
basis
explicit
field
development
scope
article
value
interception
reason
Coarse article-level tag from contextual coding. Consult the coding record for stage, actor, allegation and mixed-fraud scope. Source claims are neither independently verified nor additive.
Source statement flagsNo listed value
Current annotation provenance

The base reviewed revision is preserved. Current source bindings and approved qualifications are attached for this release.

base version key
58594d0d71dfb179005685a86c6db5ef2a2bf7a8171af64bb1145cdcc2be9ad8
current source binding
input hash
7edda2287264fd76d83371ebde617a69c6338a3666598ad76fbfad8071c6910c
decision id
ce54c06d7c8a583e2dd1f6932f455430bcc8c667fc029120c2c469496297a88e
document id
ee6d1f7ad633630f07c046e8b73176dc846b9898650ed1d057e694472a641522
hash domain
sha256-json-sortkeys-utf8-compact-v1
enrichment id
4078ae0bce2b14d494dc3f04a3756f7a2f9e124c41a0592d2513295444e49067
finding evidence sha256
bc02a011918744a103a0e1dde50c29f4e70fdbc91f4209f0a3cf7c9645bc935a
enrichment payload sha256
50da1e0ca500e2cb607e4c2c4d0fd6b6bacde05a9afe7ffe1cbf977e287606d5
approved delta ids
No listed value
provenance
Item 1
json pointer
/source_map/records/ee6d1f7ad633630f07c046e8b73176dc846b9898650ed1d057e694472a641522/annotation_binding
artifact sha256
6939f2def082e3f6a3b5e12b6ad0b2345e9d52d21c842659b684b87e8b0e6510
annotation key
d68f5fc9583c1dce79d5787b8294a72b4234bf0e4ddbebd35bf31f2245fd9131

Themes reported in the text

These labels describe the available reporting. “Not reported” does not mean a harm did not happen. A theme's stage applies to that statement, not every claim in the article.

Financial and property harm

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: attempted
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
targeted person
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

impersonationallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Relationship-based deception

fabricated relationshipallegationStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

unspecifiedreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Technical facilitation

account misuseallegationStage: requested
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
alleged offender
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Protection or recovery of assets

interceptreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
authority
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established

Help, reporting and prevention

practical supportreported occurrenceStage: completed
Interpretation details
Scope
single case
Person or institution described
support provider
Link to romance fraud
explicit
Causal claim
not established
All 24 assessed themes
ThemeAssessment
Blame, stigma and responsibility framingnot reported in available text
Homicide and lethal violencenot reported in available text
Disruption of daily lifenot reported in available text
Financial and property harmreported in available text
Suicide and self-harmnot reported in available text
Family and social harmnot reported in available text
Protection or recovery of assetsreported in available text
Policy and regulatory responsenot reported in available text
Justice proceedings and outcomesnot reported in available text
Coercion and exploitationnot reported in available text
Psychological distressnot reported in available text
Blackmail and extortionnot reported in available text
Help, reporting and preventionreported in available text
Physical or sexual harmnot reported in available text
Investment pretextnot reported in available text
Technical facilitationreported in available text
Investigation and operational responsenot reported in available text
Organization and division of labornot reported in available text
Relationship-based deceptionreported in available text
Involvement in other offendingnot reported in available text
Continued or renewed targetinginsufficient context
Prior circumstances and claimed vulnerabilitynot reported in available text
Institutional barriers or harmful responsenot reported in available text
Moving money for a schemeinsufficient context

Connected reporting

Only direct reviewed connections are shown. Shared wording is weaker evidence than a supported case connection. A connection through a third article does not establish that two reports concern the same case.

No direct connection is recorded. This does not establish that the story is unique.

Research provenance

1 saved revision. Corrections preserve earlier versions.

A page can change after it first appears. Observation dates record when its URL was seen; they do not prove that the wording assessed here was present on every date.

Record: ee6d1f7ad633630f07c046e8b73176dc846b9898650ed1d057e694472a641522
Decision: ce54c06d7c8a583e2dd1f6932f455430bcc8c667fc029120c2c469496297a88e
Base reviewed revision: 58594d0d71dfb179005685a86c6db5ef2a2bf7a8171af64bb1145cdcc2be9ad8

The local research archive retains source hashes, quoted evidence and review records. This collection does not redistribute full publisher articles.