Skip to main content

Quit Playing Games with My Heart: Understanding Online Dating Scams

JingMin Huang ; Gianluca Stringhini ; Peng Yong (2015) — Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Citation activity

Total citations · Google Scholar
Unavailable
Average per calendar year
Citation count unavailable

Counts reflect Google Scholar’s coverage and do not measure research quality. Source, calculation and limitations

View Original Source (opens in a new tab)

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20550-2_12 (opens in a new tab)

Type:   Journal Article
Country:   China
Tags:   China, Fraud Detection, Jiayuan, Romance Scams, Scam Taxonomy, Social Engineering
What do these research terms mean?
Preprint
A manuscript shared before formal peer review and publication. Check whether a later published version is available.
Dataset
A collection of data or examples for others to inspect or reuse. It can appear in Library search and topic mapping, but RSRC does not use dataset records as evidence in Research Insights.
Dissertation or thesis
Research submitted for an academic degree. This describes its format, not its reliability.
Journal article
An article published in a journal. This label alone does not establish peer review, study quality, or how well the findings apply elsewhere.
Qualitative research
Examines experiences, meanings, or processes, often through interviews or observations. It can explain how something happens without estimating how common it is.
Quantitative research
Uses numerical measurements to describe patterns or test relationships. A relationship between two measurements does not by itself show that one causes the other.
Systematic review
Uses a planned, documented method to find and assess research addressing a question. Its conclusions still depend on the included studies and what the search covered.
Meta-analysis
Statistically combines results from multiple studies. Combining studies does not remove weaknesses in their design or make unlike populations interchangeable.
Not classified
This record has no recognized label in this filter. It does not mean the publication used no method, or that no research exists.

Definitions draw on DataCite resource types; Cochrane review methods; NLM: association and causation. RSRC’s dataset and classification rules are explained in our methodology.

Citation tools
Download RIS Download BibTeX 


              
              

            

          

        


      

      

    

        
Transparency

        
Evidence and review status

        
This page contains AI-generated content. No human content review or subject-matter-expert review is recorded.

    


    

                    

                
Source basis

                

                    Downloaded PDF
                

            

                    

                
Source updates

                

                    No notice found at last check
                

            

                    

                
AI-generated page content

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Automated checks

                

                    Passed
                

            

                    

                
Administrative approval

                

                    Yes
                

            

                    

                
Human content review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

                    

                
Subject-matter-expert review

                

                    Not recorded
                

            

            


    

        
            How this was prepared
        
        

                            

                    
Source basis

                    

                    
RSRC downloaded and privately stored a copy of the paper for internal analysis. The PDF is not offered to viewers from this page.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    PDF added to RSRC:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Source updates

                    

                    
No incoming update notice was found in the dated Crossref response. Coverage is incomplete, particularly for corrections and expressions of concern; this is not a guarantee that the source is valid or unchanged.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Last source-status attempt:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
AI-generated page content

                    

                    
AI-generated research notes displayed on this page: Synopsis, Identified gaps, Methods, Limitations, Future work. The paper itself is not described as AI-generated.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Document analysis recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Synopsis generation recorded:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                            
  • 
                                    Page record updated:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Automated checks

                    

                    
The current, source-bound synopsis passed the recorded versioned publication checks.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Checks completed:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                            

                            
                                View passed checks (3)
                            
                            
    
                                                                    
  • Length, completeness, repetition, refusal, boilerplate, and active-markup screening
    • 
                                                                    
  • Numerical claims checked against the available source text
    • 
                                                                    
  • English-source lexical grounding check
    • 
                                                            

                        

                                        

                

                            

                    
Administrative approval

                    

                    
An authenticated administrator approved the bibliographic record for public Library display. This is not a review of every research claim.


                                            
    
                                                            
  • 
                                    Approved for public display:
                                    
                                
    • 
                                                    

                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Human content review

                    

                    
No human review is recorded for the AI-generated content displayed on this page.


                    
                                        

                

                            

                    
Subject-matter-expert review

                    

                    
RSRC has not recorded review of this content by a subject-matter or methods expert.


                    
                                        

                

                    

    


    

        Review-state definitions

        Found a possible error?
        Request a correction.
    



    



              

        
                  

            
Synopsis

            
This publication presents the first large-scale examination of online dating scams, focusing on how scammers operate on dating platforms and how site operators can detect them. The authors describe online dating as a space that blends legitimate matchmaking with unique risks, noting that scams can unfold over long periods and often involve personalized, long-form interactions rather than bulk spam. The study analyzes a substantial dataset of scam accounts from Jiayuan, described as the largest Chinese online dating site, collected over an eleven-month period and totaling 510,503 scam accounts. The aims are to characterize the threat, develop a taxonomy of scam types, and illuminate traits and behaviors that could inform improved detection. Methodologically, the work combines human expert vetting with multiple automated detectors to identify scam accounts. Four detection approaches are detailed: behavioral-based detection (modeling scam vs. legitimate account behavior), IP-address-based detection, photograph-based detection (identifying duplicate or re-encoded images), and text-based detection (flagging suspicious messaging). The paper then classifiers scam accounts into four categories: Escort Service Advertisements, Dates for Profit, Swindlers, and Matchmaking Services, and provides descriptive statistics and case studies for each. Key findings include substantial differences in demographics between scams and legitimate users, such as gender presentation and stated age, as well as distinct strategies scammers use to attract victims, with many scams initiating contact with numerous targets while some rely on more personalized exchanges. The authors acknowledge limitations, including the single-site focus and cultural specificity, and they emphasize that advanced scams remain difficult to detect automatically and may require law enforcement collaboration. They conclude with implications for improving detection systems, future research directions, and the need to extend analyses to other markets and sites to better understand the evolving landscape of online dating deception.

          

        
                  

            
Identified Gaps

            
The paper identifies a lack of large-scale research on online dating scams; earlier work relied on individual incidents and single-scheme descriptions. It also leaves uncertainty about whether findings from Jiayuan generalize beyond China, how cross-border schemes operate, how much money scams steal, and how scam patterns differ on paid dating sites.

          

        
                  

            
Methods

            
The study analyzed 510,503 human-vetted scam accounts detected on Jiayuan over 11 months in 2012–2013. It classified accounts into four scam types and compared their profile demographics, messaging behavior, and IP-address access patterns with legitimate accounts. The dataset was assembled through behavioral, IP-address, photograph, and text-based flagging systems, followed by human specialist review. External authors worked with aggregated statistics rather than personal data.

          

        
                  

            
Limitations

            
The analysis is limited to one Chinese dating platform, Jiayuan, so findings may reflect Chinese cultural practices and may not generalize to other countries or international platforms. The sample includes accounts detected and frozen by platform systems, meaning activity measures are lower bounds because accounts could have contacted more users if left active. Account labels depend on human review and may contain analyst errors.

          

        
                  

            
Future Work

            
Develop detection techniques that identify advanced and stealthy scammers with minimal human review, potentially using profile, interaction, and stylometric features. Study dating sites in other countries, especially international platforms and cross-border schemes. Investigate the underground economy of these scams, including the amount of money stolen. Examine paid-subscription dating sites, where the scammer population may be more concentrated in advanced schemes.

          

              

    
    

        
Related Research Insights

        

            See how this publication connects to RSRC's living evidence syntheses through current citations and research-topic mapping.